<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for That Future Is Gone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yerkey.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yerkey.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Jeff Yerkey's blog on design, tech, politics... the usual junk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:04:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on ABC Outfoxes Fox News on Debate by frankpryor</title>
		<link>http://yerkey.wordpress.com/2008/04/17/abc-news/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>frankpryor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yerkey.wordpress.com/?p=14#comment-2</guid>
		<description>The President of ABC seems very pleased to have made two democrats look bad in one broadcast.

It&#039;s worthwhile for us to remember who we&#039;re watching. What might have the debate have sounded like if it had been arranged at the headquarters of Exxon or Goldman-Sachs or Haliburton or any of the other corporations who have been able to conjure tax-breaks and favorable legislation with a phone call and a few paltry millions in political pin-money? Broadcasting is little different and, miserable lapdog though it is, the Democratic party is not [i]quite[/i] as eager to tug at it&#039;s forelock and rush to do the bidding of our corporate citizens. 

btw: nice lookin&#039; blog ya got here.

fp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The President of ABC seems very pleased to have made two democrats look bad in one broadcast.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s worthwhile for us to remember who we&#8217;re watching. What might have the debate have sounded like if it had been arranged at the headquarters of Exxon or Goldman-Sachs or Haliburton or any of the other corporations who have been able to conjure tax-breaks and favorable legislation with a phone call and a few paltry millions in political pin-money? Broadcasting is little different and, miserable lapdog though it is, the Democratic party is not [i]quite[/i] as eager to tug at it&#8217;s forelock and rush to do the bidding of our corporate citizens. </p>
<p>btw: nice lookin&#8217; blog ya got here.</p>
<p>fp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
